Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Manufacture of Corporate Social Responsibility: Constructing Corporate Sensibility

John Roberts

University of Cambridge, UK

This paper develops a framework for differentiating between mere image and substance in corporate claims to social responsibility. The paper begins by drawing upon the work of Levinas to explore the nature of responsibility and ethical sensibility. It then explores four versions of corporate social responsibility (CSR): the conditions under which CSR is squeezed out by the dominance of financial pressures; the embrace of CSR as a form of public relations so as to allow business to continue as usual; the adoption within the firm of new forms of measurement and incentives to motivate increased attention to the ethical, social and environmental impacts; and finally CSR as a dialogue across the corporate boundary with those most vulnerable to the effects of corporate conduct. The paper concludes by exploring the complex relationships between these different versions of CSR.

Key Words: corporate social responsibility • dialogue • ethics • governance • identity

Organization, Vol. 10, No. 2, 249-265 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1350508403010002004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
OrganizationHome page
T. Jensen, J. Sandstrom, and S. Helin
Corporate Codes of Ethics and the Bending of Moral Space
Organization, July 1, 2009; 16(4): 529 - 545.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
F. Cooren, B. H.J.M. Brummans, and D. Charrieras
The coproduction of organizational presence: A study of Medecins Sans Frontieres in action
Human Relations, October 1, 2008; 61(10): 1339 - 1370.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of MacromarketingHome page
J. C. Healy
Review: For Business Ethics Campbell Jones, Martin Parker and Rene ten Bos New York: Routledge, 2005
Journal of Macromarketing, December 1, 2007; 27(4): 412 - 414.
[PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
L. W. Fransen and A. Kolk
Global Rule-Setting for Business: A Critical Analysis of Multi-Stakeholder Standards
Organization, September 1, 2007; 14(5): 667 - 684.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
H. Collins and E. Wray-Bliss
Discriminating ethics
Human Relations, June 1, 2005; 58(6): 799 - 824.
[Abstract] [PDF]