Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by du Gay, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Tyranny of the Epochal: Change, Epochalism and Organizational Reform

Paul du Gay

The Open University, Milton Keynes, UKp.l.j.dugay{at}open.ac.uk

The paper focuses upon a particular discourse of organizational ‘change’ as it has appeared in a specific context—the contemporary field of public administration—and seeks to explore its role as a rhetorical device in reshaping the identity of public service. It does so first by seeking to indicate the epochalist bent of much theorizing about contemporary economic and organizational change—in both its academic and its more managerial manifestations. Second, it seeks to show how a particular discourse of organizational change mobilizes support for attempts to ‘re-invent’ or ‘modernize’ the public administration as an institution of government. Finally, it seeks to offer a few words in support of the seemingly unfashionable art of ‘piecemeal reform’ or ‘ organizational casuistry’.

Key Words: bureaucracy • casuistry • change • enterprise • epochalism • government

Organization, Vol. 10, No. 4, 663-684 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/13505084030104003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
D. McCabe
Enterprise contested: Betwixt and between the discourses of career and enterprise in a UK bank
Human Relations, October 1, 2009; 62(10): 1551 - 1579.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Management & Organizational HistoryHome page
C. Grey and A. Sturdy
Historicising knowledge-intensive organizations: The case of Bletchley Park
Management & Organizational History, May 1, 2009; 4(2): 131 - 150.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
B. McKenna and D. Rooney
Wise Leadership and the Capacity for Ontological Acuity
Management Communication Quarterly, May 1, 2008; 21(4): 537 - 546.
[PDF]

Home page
 Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
T. E. Jensen
Future and Furniture: A Study of a New Economy Firm's Powers of Persuasion
Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 2008; 33(1): 28 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
C. De Cock and S. Bohm
Liberalist Fantasies: Zizek and the Impossibility of the Open Society
Organization, November 1, 2007; 14(6): 815 - 836.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
C. Jones and A. Spicer
The Sublime Object of Entrepreneurship
Organization, March 1, 2005; 12(2): 223 - 246.
[Abstract] [PDF]