Organization

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kallinikos, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Organization, Vol. 11, No. 1, 13-36 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1350508404039657

The Social Foundations of the Bureaucratic Order

Jannis Kallinikos

London School of Economics, UKj.kallinikos{at}lse.ac.uk

This article views the bureaucratic form of organization as both an agent and an expression of key modern social innovations that are most clearly manifested in the non-inclusive terms by which individuals are involved in organizations. Modern human involvement in organizations epitomizes and institutionally embeds the crucial yet often overlooked cultural orientation of modernity whereby humans undertake action along well-specified and delimited paths thanks to their capacity to isolate and suspend other personal or social considerations. The organizational involvement of humans qua role agents rather than qua persons helps unleash formal organizing from being tied to the indolence of the human body and the languish process of personal or psychological reorientation. Thanks to the loosening of these ties, the bureaucratic organization is rendered able to address the shifting contingencies underlying modern life by reshuffling and re-assembling the roles and role patterns by which it is made. The historically unique adaptive capacity of bureaucracy remains, though hidden behind the ubiquitous presence of routines and standard operating procedures that are mistakenly exchanged for the essence of the bureaucratic form.

Key Words: adaptability • behaviour • bureaucracy • formal role systems • modernity • role enactment


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
M. Harris
Digital technology and governance in transition: The case of the British Library
Human Relations, May 1, 2008; 61(5): 741 - 758.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
D. McCabe
Who's Afraid of Enterprise?: Producing and Repressing the Enterprise Self in a UK Bank
Organization, May 1, 2008; 15(3): 371 - 387.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
N. Hayes
Institutionalizing change in a high-technology optronics company: The role of information and communication technologies
Human Relations, February 1, 2008; 61(2): 243 - 269.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
M. Neal, J. L. Finlay, Gh. A. Catana, and D. Catana
A Comparison of Leadership Prototypes of Arab and European Females
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, December 1, 2007; 7(3): 291 - 316.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
A. A. Ballas and H. Tsoukas
Measuring Nothing: The Case of the Greek National Health System
Human Relations, June 1, 2004; 57(6): 661 - 690.
[Abstract] [PDF]