This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kallinikos, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Social Foundations of the Bureaucratic Order

London School of Economics, UKj.kallinikos{at}lse.ac.uk

This article views the bureaucratic form of organization as both an agent and an expression of key modern social innovations that are most clearly manifested in the non-inclusive terms by which individuals are involved in organizations. Modern human involvement in organizations epitomizes and institutionally embeds the crucial yet often overlooked cultural orientation of modernity whereby humans undertake action along well-specified and delimited paths thanks to their capacity to isolate and suspend other personal or social considerations. The organizational involvement of humans qua role agents rather than qua persons helps unleash formal organizing from being tied to the indolence of the human body and the languish process of personal or psychological reorientation. Thanks to the loosening of these ties, the bureaucratic organization is rendered able to address the shifting contingencies underlying modern life by reshuffling and re-assembling the roles and role patterns by which it is made. The historically unique adaptive capacity of bureaucracy remains, though hidden behind the ubiquitous presence of routines and standard operating procedures that are mistakenly exchanged for the essence of the bureaucratic form.

Key Words: adaptability • behaviour • bureaucracy • formal role systems • modernity • role enactment

Organization, Vol. 11, No. 1, 13-36 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1350508404039657


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Grover Privatizing employment services in Britain Critical Social Policy, August 1, 2009; 29(3): 487 - 509. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. DeHart-Davis Can Bureaucracy Benefit Organizational Women?: An Exploratory Study Administration Society, May 1, 2009; 41(3): 340 - 363. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Styhre Management Control in Bureaucratic and Postbureaucratic Organizations: A Lacanian Perspective Group Organization Management, December 1, 2008; 33(6): 635 - 656. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Harris Digital technology and governance in transition: The case of the British Library Human Relations, May 1, 2008; 61(5): 741 - 758. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. McCabe Who's Afraid of Enterprise?: Producing and Repressing the Enterprise Self in a UK Bank Organization, May 1, 2008; 15(3): 371 - 387. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Hayes Institutionalizing change in a high-technology optronics company: The role of information and communication technologies Human Relations, February 1, 2008; 61(2): 243 - 269. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Neal, J. L. Finlay, Gh. A. Catana, and D. Catana A Comparison of Leadership Prototypes of Arab and European Females International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, December 1, 2007; 7(3): 291 - 316. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. A. Ballas and H. Tsoukas Measuring Nothing: The Case of the Greek National Health System Human Relations, June 1, 2004; 57(6): 661 - 690. [Abstract] [PDF]