This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Czarniawska, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

On Time, Space, and Action Nets

GRI, Göteborg University, Sweden, barbara.czarniawska{at}gri.gu.se

Laboratory studies, especially those by Latour and Woolgar (1979/1986) and Knorr Cetina (1981) have proved to be an invaluable source of inspiration for students of organizing. Laboratories, however, are primarily reminiscent of simple factories, an organization form that is no longer central in today’s world of work organizations. Two aspects of factory-like organizing are problematized in this paper: the dominance of chronological time and the existence of centers of calculation. Complementing these aspects with kairotic time and dispersed calculation will bring the two types of studies even closer. Such a rapprochement will allow for the adjustment of methodological approaches in studies of organization in a way similar to that dominant in SST (studies of science and technology) research. Two such changes are suggested: the study of action nets rather than organizations as study objects, which require the reversal of the time perspective; and the use of mobile ethnologies, facilitating study of the life and work of people who move around a great deal.

Key Words: chronological time • dispersed calculations • kairotic time • mobile ethnographies • organizing in action nets

Organization, Vol. 11, No. 6, 773-791 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1350508404047251


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Gherardi Introduction: The Critical Power of the `Practice Lens' Management Learning, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 115 - 128. [PDF]

				F. Blackler and S. Regan Intentionality, Agency, Change: Practice Theory and Management Management Learning, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 161 - 176. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Woolgar, C. Coopmans, and D. Neyland Does STS Mean Business? Organization, January 1, 2009; 16(1): 5 - 30. [PDF]

				F. Cochoy Driving a Shopping Cart from STS to Business, and the Other Way Round: On the Introduction of Shopping Carts in American Grocery Stores (1936--1959) Organization, January 1, 2009; 16(1): 31 - 55. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Hitchin and W. Maksymiw STS in Management Education: Connecting Theory and Practice Organization, January 1, 2009; 16(1): 57 - 80. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. A. Bartel and R. Garud The Role of Narratives in Sustaining Organizational Innovation Organization Science, January 1, 2009; 20(1): 107 - 117. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Andersson, K. Aspenberg, and H. Kjellberg The configuration of actors in market practice Marketing Theory, March 1, 2008; 8(1): 67 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Steen, C. Coopmans, and J. Whyte Structure and agency? Actor-network theory and strategic organization Strategic Organization, August 1, 2006; 4(3): 303 - 312. [PDF]

				C. Hine Databases as Scientific Instruments and Their Role in the Ordering of Scientific Work Social Studies of Science, April 1, 2006; 36(2): 269 - 298. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Quattrone The Possibility of the Testimony: A Case for Case Study Research Organization, January 1, 2006; 13(1): 143 - 157. [Abstract] [PDF]