Organization

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clegg, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rhodes, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Organization, Vol. 12, No. 2, 147-167 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1350508405051186
© 2005 SAGE Publications

Learning/Becoming/Organizing

Stewart R. Clegg

University of Technology, Sydney, Australia, s.clegg{at}uts.edu.au

Martin Kornberger

University of Technology, Sydney, Australia, martin.kornberger{at}uts.edu.au

Carl Rhodes

University of Technology, Sydney, Australia, carl.rhodes{at}uts.edu.au

In this paper we rethink and reframe organizational learning in terms of organizational becoming. We see these concepts as two mutually implicating ways of exploring and simultaneously constituting the phenomena of organization. Bearing in mind that the understanding of organization is simultaneously a question of the organization of understanding, we reflect on the complex interrelation between thinking and organizing. In order to connect the processes of learning and becoming, we consider the concept of organization as space in between order and chaos. We propose a perspective that sees learning not as something that is done to organizations, or as something that an organization does; rather, learning and organizing are seen as mutually constitutive and unstable, yet pragmatic, constructs that might enable a dynamic appreciation of organizational life. Further, we argue that the becoming that is in organizing implies a permanent non-rational movement such that organization can never be rationally defined.

Key Words: becoming • dis/organization • innovation • learning • power


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
OrganizationHome page
D. P. O'Doherty
The Blur Sensation: Shadows of the Future
Organization, July 1, 2008; 15(4): 535 - 561.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
E. Antonacopoulou and R. Chiva
The Social Complexity of Organizational Learning: The Dynamics of Learning and Organizing
Management Learning, July 1, 2007; 38(3): 277 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
S. R. Clegg, C. Rhodes, and M. Kornberger
Desperately Seeking Legitimacy: Organizational Identity and Emerging Industries
Organization Studies, April 1, 2007; 28(4): 495 - 513.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Rural ManagementHome page
C. Cannarella and V. Piccioni
Dysfunctions and Sub-optimal Behaviours of Rural Development Networks
International Journal of Rural Management, July 1, 2006; 2(1): 29 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
A. Carlsen
Organizational Becoming as Dialogic Imagination of Practice: The Case of the Indomitable Gauls
Organization Science, January 1, 2006; 17(1): 132 - 149.
[Abstract] [PDF]