This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Law, J. Articles by Singleton, V. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Object Lessons

Lancaster University, UK, j.law{at}lancaster.ac.uk

Vicky Singleton

Lancaster University, UK, d.singleton{at}lancaster.ac.uk

During research on the management of alcoholic liver disease the authors found that it was difficult to keep the condition in focus through the course of the study. Perhaps this was a sign of methodological failure, but this paper explores an alternative possibility: that social science methods are ill adapted for the study of complex and messy objects. The paper reviews arguments about the character of complex objects as these have been recently elaborated within science, technology and society (STS), and applies these to alcoholic liver disease. Three versions of the object (as region, network and fluid) are found to be relevant. But so, too, is a fourth, fire version, which treats objects as patterns of discontinuity between absence and presence. It is argued that the messiness of alcoholic liver disease in part becomes comprehensible if we imagine it as a fire object.

Key Words: actor network theory • alcoholic liver disease • fire • fluidity • health • objects • spatiality • topology

Organization, Vol. 12, No. 3, 331-355 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1350508405051270


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				U. Eriksson-Zetterquist, K. Lindberg, and A. Styhre When the good times are over: Professionals encountering new technology Human Relations, August 1, 2009; 62(8): 1145 - 1170. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Jensen, J. Sandstrom, and S. Helin Corporate Codes of Ethics and the Bending of Moral Space Organization, July 1, 2009; 16(4): 529 - 545. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Bissell Inconsequential Materialities: The Movements of Lost Effects Space and Culture, February 1, 2009; 12(1): 95 - 115. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Zeiss and P. Groenewegen Engaging Boundary Objects in OMS and STS? Exploring the Subtleties of Layered Engagement Organization, January 1, 2009; 16(1): 81 - 100. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Cooren, B. H.J.M. Brummans, and D. Charrieras The coproduction of organizational presence: A study of Medecins Sans Frontieres in action Human Relations, October 1, 2008; 61(10): 1339 - 1370. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Johnson Simulating Medical Patients and Practices: Bodies and the Construction of Valid Medical Simulators Body Society, September 1, 2008; 14(3): 105 - 128. [PDF]

				T. Fenwick Whither Research in Enterprise? A Response to Salaman and Storey Organization, May 1, 2008; 15(3): 325 - 332. [PDF]

				J. H. Finch and V. L. Acha Making and exchanging a second-hand oil field, considered in an industrial marketing setting Marketing Theory, March 1, 2008; 8(1): 45 - 66. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Walby On the Social Relations of Research: A Critical Assessment of Institutional Ethnography Qualitative Inquiry, October 1, 2007; 13(7): 1008 - 1030. [Abstract] [PDF]