Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suchman, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Affiliative Objects

Lucy Suchman

Lancaster University, UK, l.suchman{at}lancaster.ac.uk

Through the case of a particular organization devoted to technological research and development, this paper investigates how values of the ‘new’ operate in what Appadurai (1986) has characterized as the social life of objects. Drawing on previous scholarship in anthropology and science and technology studies, I adopt the trope of the ‘affiliative object’ to describe the relational dynamics of association (and disassociation) that characterize the identification of objects and persons. This perspective emphasizes the multiplicity of objects within the unfolding and uncertain trajectories of organizational life, as both problem and resource for organization members. The paper examines how ‘object-centered sociality’ (Knorr-Cetina, 1997) is enacted as a strategic, but also contingent, resource in the alignment of professional identities and organizational positionings.

Key Words: identity • invention • materiality • multiplicity • object-centered sociality

Organization, Vol. 12, No. 3, 379-399 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1350508405051276
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 OrganizationHome page
J. Kallinikos
On the Computational Rendition of Reality: Artefacts and Human Agency
Organization, March 1, 2009; 16(2): 183 - 202.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
J. Moisander and S. Stenfors
Exploring the Edges of Theory-Practice Gap: Epistemic Cultures in Strategy-Tool Development and Use
Organization, March 1, 2009; 16(2): 227 - 247.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Critical Social PolicyHome page
S. Hunter
Living documents: A feminist psychosocial approach to the relational politics of policy documentation
Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2008; 28(4): 506 - 528.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
J. Locke and A. Lowe
A Biography: Fabrications in the Life of an ERP Package
Organization, November 1, 2007; 14(6): 793 - 814.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Teacher EducationHome page
D. Anagnostopoulos, E. R. Smith, and K. G. Basmadjian
Bridging the University-School Divide: Horizontal Expertise and the "Two-Worlds Pitfall"
Journal of Teacher Education, March 1, 2007; 58(2): 138 - 152.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
I. Cook et al.
Geographies of food: following
Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2006; 30(5): 655 - 666.
[PDF]