This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rhodes, C. Articles by Brown, A. D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Writing Responsibly: Narrative Fiction and Organization Studies

University of Technology, Sydney, Australia, carl.rhodes{at}uts.edu.au

Andrew D. Brown

University of Bath, UK, andrew.brown{at}management.bath.ac.uk

In this paper, we reflect on the use of fictional source material and fictional formats in organization studies in order to explore issues of responsibility in the writing of research. We start by examining how research using fictional narrative methods has worked to radically destabilize distinctions between what is real and what is fictional. In relation to this, we ask the question: if a research account can be regarded as fiction, what are the implications of this insight for the responsibilities of authors? Opposing the view that using fiction necessarily leads to an ‘anything goes’ relativism, we argue that a recognition of the fictionality of research texts implies a heightened sense of researcher-author responsibility. We see our main contribution as extending existing discussions of reflexivity in research into a consideration of issues of ethics and responsibility as it relates to the textuality of research writing. To do so, we draw on Derrida’s theorization of responsibility and undecidability as a way of problematizing and discussing the ethics of research in relation to its textuality. We argue that the explicit borrowing from fictional genres evinces the essentially ‘written’ and fictional status of research papers, and highlights the ethical dimensions associated with decisions related to representational strategies and authorial subjectivity.

Key Words: narrative • fiction • reflexivity • responsibility • writing

Organization, Vol. 12, No. 4, 467-491 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1350508405052757


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. O'Doherty and H. Willmott The Decline of Labour Process Analysis and the Future Sociology of Work Sociology, October 1, 2009; 43(5): 931 - 951. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Geiger and E. Antonacopoulou Narratives and Organizational Dynamics: Exploring Blind Spots and Organizational Inertia Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, September 1, 2009; 45(3): 411 - 436. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. E. Peirano-Vejo and R. E. Stablein Constituting Change and Stability: Sense-making Stories in a Farming Organization Organization, May 1, 2009; 16(3): 443 - 462. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Essers Reflections on the Narrative Approach: Dilemmas of Power, Emotions and Social Location While Constructing Life-Stories Organization, March 1, 2009; 16(2): 163 - 181. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Whittle From Flexibility to Work-Life Balance: Exploring the Changing Discourses of Management Consultants Organization, July 1, 2008; 15(4): 513 - 534. [Abstract] [PDF]