Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mutch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ventresca, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Situating Organizational Action: The Relational Sociology of Organizations

Alistair Mutch

Nottingham Trent University, UK

Rick Delbridge

ESRC/EPSRC Advanced Institute of Management Research, UK, and Cardiff Business School, UK

Marc Ventresca

University of Oxford, UK

This paper advances a relational sociology of organization that seeks to address concerns over how organizational action is understood and situated. The approach outlined here is one which takes ontology seriously and requires transparency and consistency of position. It aims at causal explanation over description and/or prediction and seeks to avoid pure voluntarism or structural determinism in such explanation. We advocate relational analysis that recognizes and engages with connections within and across organization and with wider contexts. We develop this argument by briefly reviewing three promising approaches: relational pragmatism, the social theorizing of Bourdieu and critical realism, highlighting their ontological foundations, some similarities and differences and surfacing some methodological issues. Our purpose is to encourage analysis that explores the connections within and between perspectives and theoretical positions. We conclude that the development of the field of organization theory will benefit from self conscious and reflexive engagement and debate both within and across our various research positions and traditions only if such debates are conducted on the basis of holistic evaluations and interpretations that recognize (and value) difference.

Key Words: Archer • Bourdieu • Emirbayer and Mische • relational sociology

Organization, Vol. 13, No. 5, 607-625 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1350508406067006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Current SociologyHome page
S. Mutzel
Networks as Culturally Constituted Processes: A Comparison of Relational Sociology and Actor-network Theory
Current Sociology, November 1, 2009; 57(6): 871 - 887.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
A. L. Wright
Domination in Organizational Fields: It's Just Not Cricket
Organization, November 1, 2009; 16(6): 855 - 885.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
N. Slutskaya and C. De Cock
The Body Dances: Carnival Dance and Organization
Organization, November 1, 2008; 15(6): 851 - 868.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
R. Delbridge and T. Edwards
Challenging conventions: Roles and processes during non-isomorphic institutional change
Human Relations, March 1, 2008; 61(3): 299 - 325.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
J. O'Mahoney
Constructing habitus: the negotiation of moral encounters at Telekom
Work Employment Society, September 1, 2007; 21(3): 479 - 496.
[Abstract] [PDF]