|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Liberalist Fantasies: i ek and the Impossibility of the Open Society
Christian De Cock
School of Business and Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK, c.de-cock{at}swansea.ac.uk
Steffen Böhm
Department of Accounting, Finance and Management, University of Essex, Colchester, UK, sgbohm{at}essex.ac.uk
In this paper we engage with the liberalist project in organization and management studies. The first `face' of organizational liberalism is expressed through post-bureaucratic discourses which very much define the mainstream of management thought today, highlighting the need for organizational openness which can only come through a liberation of management from the closed structures of the bureaucracy. The second face of organizational liberalism defends the bureaucratic ethos of liberal-democratic institutions and points to the Popperian concept of the `open society' that requires rational, procedural laws to reconcile conflicting values in societies and organizations, thus ensuring the existence of a plurality of ways of life. We point to the limitations of both `faces' of organizational liberalism by discussing key aspects of Slavoj i ek's work. i ek displaces the liberal conception of institutionally sanctioned `openness' by claiming this actually constitutes a closure and puts a challenge to us. How can we create real openness? How is a real difference possible?
Key Words: bureaucracy capitalism ideology liberalism open society political philosophy i ek
Organization, Vol. 14, No. 6,
815-836 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1350508407082264

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Spicer, M. Alvesson, and D. Karreman
Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies
Human Relations,
April 1, 2009;
62(4):
537 - 560.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Woolgar, C. Coopmans, and D. Neyland
Does STS Mean Business?
Organization,
January 1, 2009;
16(1):
5 - 30.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Bohm and V. Brei
Marketing the hegemony of development: of pulp fictions and green deserts
Marketing Theory,
December 1, 2008;
8(4):
339 - 366.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Styhre
Management Control in Bureaucratic and Postbureaucratic Organizations: A Lacanian Perspective
Group Organization Management,
December 1, 2008;
33(6):
635 - 656.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Contu
Decaf Resistance: On Misbehavior, Cynicism, and Desire in Liberal Workplaces
Management Communication Quarterly,
February 1, 2008;
21(3):
364 - 379.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|