| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Anti-dialogic Positioning in Change Stories: Bank Robbers, Saviours and PeonsUniversity of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, UK, pnhb{at}st-andrews.ac.uk
Staples Inc., Framingham, MA, USA, Stacy.macphail{at}staples.com
Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham, UK, Chris.Coupland{at}nottingham.ac.uk Stories people tell of going through change incorporate and react to others around them. Positions can be taken in stories that tend towards the monological, having a singular perspective and being somewhat sealed off from others. Alternatively, stories can tend towards the dialogical, a multiple, less certain and more interactive mode. We explore multiple stories of an organizational change and analyse a paradoxical situation that emerges. We argue that although the stories may have the appearance of being dialogical, they can be seen as co-existing but self-sealing, or anti-dialogic. We introduce an interruption to the story and discuss a possibility for challenging anti-dialogic positioning in change stories.
Key Words: dialogue fantasy insulating identity work self-sealing stories
Organization, Vol. 16, No. 3,
335-352 (2009) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
