This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Blackler, F. Articles by McDonald, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Managing Experts and Competing through Innovation: An Activity Theoretical Analysis

Lancaster University

Norman Crump

Lancaster University

Seonaidh McDonald

Lancaster University

An activity theoretical analysis is presented of an organization that is operating in a rapidly changing sector and whose competitiveness depends significantly upon the design skills of its engineers. The company designs high-technology make-to-order products. Like other organizations that compete through knowledge and innovation, the prosperity of this company depends upon its organizational learning, that is, upon the effectiveness with which it can mobilize, apply and develop its distinctive knowledge base as circumstances change. In the difficult context that the company faces, the speed with which projects can move from the initial concept phase through design to production has to become especially important. The paper outlines a general strategy that was developed as the company sought to control this process and traces the consequences for design practices. An activity theoretical approach is used to model the changes that were attempted and the outcomes which emerged and to introduce a discussion of possible future options. The approach (i) emphasizes the relevance of a historical perspective on organizational change, (ii) features the changing nature of expertise in contemporary manufacturing and (iii) discusses the potential significance for collective learning of tensions and incoherencies within a work system.

Organization, Vol. 6, No. 1, 5-31 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/135050849961001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Ambrosini, C. Bowman, and S. Burton-Taylor Inter-team coordination activities as a source of customer satisfaction Human Relations, January 1, 2007; 60(1): 59 - 98. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Tell What Do Organizations Know? Dynamics of Justification Contexts in R&D Activities Organization, July 1, 2004; 11(4): 443 - 471. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Blackler, N. Crump, and S. McDonald Organizing Processes in Complex Activity Networks Organization, May 1, 2000; 7(2): 277 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF]