Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sotirin, P.
Right arrow Articles by Gottfried, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Ambivalent Dynamics of Secretarial `Bitching': Control, Resistance, and the Construction of Identity

Patty Sotirin

Michigan Technological University

Heidi Gottfried

Purdue University

We conceptualize bitching as an ambivalent communicative practice that takes place in and contributes to the construction of gendered organizational identities. Through interpretive analyses of in situ bitching among corporate secretaries, we show how the ambivalent dynamics of their collective bitching both maintained stereotypical gender attributes and destabilized the properly professional secretarial identity. By elaborating the ambivalent dynamics of bitching, we offer a more nuanced understanding of the interplay of control and resistance in the communicative construction of gendered workplace identities.

Organization, Vol. 6, No. 1, 57-80 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/135050849961003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
A. van Iterson and S. R. Clegg
The politics of gossip and denial in interorganizational relations
Human Relations, August 1, 2008; 61(8): 1117 - 1137.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 DISCOURSE & COMMUNICATIONHome page
K. L. Ashcraft
Appreciating the 'work' of discourse: occupational identity and difference as organizing mechanisms in the case of commercial airline pilots
Discourse & Communication, February 1, 2007; 1(1): 9 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Work Employment SocietyHome page
S. C. Bolton and M. Houlihan
The (mis)representation of customer service
Work Employment Society, December 1, 2005; 19(4): 685 - 703.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
L. L. Putnam, D. Grant, G. Michelson, and L. Cutcher
Discourse and Resistance: Targets, Practices, and Consequences
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 2005; 19(1): 5 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
D. K. Mumby
Theorizing Resistance in Organization Studies: A Dialectical Approach
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 2005; 19(1): 19 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
K. L. Ashcraft
Resistance Through Consent?: Occupational Identity, Organizational Form, and the Maintenance of Masculinity Among Commercial Airline Pilots
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 2005; 19(1): 67 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
S. Merilainen, J. Tienari, R. Thomas, and A. Davies
Management Consultant Talk: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Normalizing Discourse and Resistance
Organization, July 1, 2004; 11(4): 539 - 564.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
N. C. Townsley
Review Article: Looking Back, Looking Forward. Mapping the Gendered Theories, Voices, and Politics of Organization
Organization, August 1, 2003; 10(3): 617 - 639.
[PDF]