Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooke, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Writing the Left out of Management Theory: The Historiography of the Management of Change

Bill Cooke

University of Manchester

The change management discourse has appropriated central ideas of action research, group dynamics, and the management of attitude change from the political left. This has been concealed by the way that that discourse has written its own history, that is, its historiography. Managerialist accounts of the lives of Kurt Lewin and John Collier (in relation to group dynamics and action research), and of the work of Edgar Schein (in relation to the management of attitude change), are compared with those found in non-managerialist sources. The latter alone reveal Lewin's left activism, his working relationship with the radical John Collier, and the likelihood that Collier invented action research before Lewin. They also show how Schein's theory of attitude change was derived from the Chinese Communist Party. Change management's very construction has been a political process which has written the left out, and shaped an understanding of the field as technocratic and ideologically neutral. However, it is not only managerialist historiographies, but also supposedly more critical approaches to organizational theory which have a historiographical shaping effect.

Organization, Vol. 6, No. 1, 81-105 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/135050849961004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Organization StudiesHome page
M. Ruef and A. Harness
Agrarian Origins of Management Ideology: The Roman and Antebellum Cases
Organization Studies, June 1, 2009; 30(6): 589 - 607.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Management & Organizational HistoryHome page
B. Cooke
The Tavistock's everyday use of benzedrine, and more: On the multiple significances of DB, scholar--publisher
Management & Organizational History, May 1, 2009; 4(2): 203 - 206.
[PDF]

Home page
 Management & Organizational HistoryHome page
M. Hughes
Reengineering works: Don't report, exhort
Management & Organizational History, February 1, 2009; 4(1): 105 - 122.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Management & Organizational HistoryHome page
T. Weatherbee, K. Dye, and A. J. Mills
There's nothing as good as a practical theory: The paradox of management education
Management & Organizational History, May 1, 2008; 3(2): 147 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 LeadershipHome page
A. Trethewey and H.L. Goodall JR
Leadership Reconsidered as Historical Subject: Sketches from the Cold War to Post-9/11
Leadership, November 1, 2007; 3(4): 457 - 477.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
B. Cooke
The Kurt Lewin-Goodwin Watson FBI/CIA files: A 60th anniversary there-and-then of the here-and-now
Human Relations, March 1, 2007; 60(3): 435 - 462.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Action ResearchHome page
E. H. Neilsen
But let us not forget John Collier: Commentary on David Bargal's 'Personal and intellectual influences leading to Lewin's paradigm on action research'
Action Research, December 1, 2006; 4(4): 389 - 399.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Management & Organizational HistoryHome page
K. Bruce
Henry S. Dennison, Elton Mayo, and Human Relations historiography
Management & Organizational History, May 1, 2006; 1(2): 177 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
E. S. Kelley, A. J. Mills, and B. Cooke
Management as a Cold War phenomenon?
Human Relations, May 1, 2006; 59(5): 603 - 610.
[PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
O. Landau
Cold War political culture and the return of systems rationality
Human Relations, May 1, 2006; 59(5): 637 - 663.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
B. Cooke
The Cold War origin of action research as managerialist cooptation
Human Relations, May 1, 2006; 59(5): 665 - 693.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Management & Organizational HistoryHome page
C. Booth and M. Rowlinson
Management and organizational history: Prospects
Management & Organizational History, February 1, 2006; 1(1): 5 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Organization ManagementHome page
B. Cooke, A. J. Mills, and E. S. Kelley
Situating Maslow in Cold War America: A Recontextualization of Management Theory
Group Organization Management, April 1, 2005; 30(2): 129 - 152.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
B. Cooke
The Managing of the (Third) World
Organization, September 1, 2004; 11(5): 603 - 629.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Management LearningHome page
S. Down
Knowledge Sharing Review the Use of History in Business and Management, and Some Implications for Management Learning
Management Learning, September 1, 2001; 32(3): 393 - 410.
[PDF]