This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Tsoukas, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

David and Goliath in the Risk Society: Making Sense of the Conflict between Shell and Greenpeace in the North Sea

ALBA and University of Essex

It is argued here that the victory of Greenpeace over Shell in the North Sea, in June 1995, exemplifies the empowerment of small organizations in the semiotic environment in which organizations in late modernity increasingly tend to operate. More specifically, it is argued that in late modern societies risk production tends to be at least as important as wealth production. In the risk society, symbolic power is of great importance, at times more important than economic power; social reflexivity, unfolding within a public discourse which favours post-materialist values, is an integral part of societal functioning; and the role of mediated communication occupies a central place. In a semiotic environment, business organizations do not only compete in the marketplace but, increasingly, in a discursive space in which winning the argument is just as important. These concepts are used to throw light on the conflict that broke out between Shell and Greenpeace in the North Sea, over the offshore dumping of a defunct oil platform.

Organization, Vol. 6, No. 3, 499-528 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/135050849963007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P. Cornelissen and M. Kafouros The Emergent Organization: Primary and Complex Metaphors in Theorizing about Organizations Organization Studies, July 1, 2008; 29(7): 957 - 978. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Holzer Turning Stakeseekers Into Stakeholders: A Political Coalition Perspective on the Politics of Stakeholder Influence Business Society, March 1, 2008; 47(1): 50 - 67. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Spicer and S. Bohm Moving Management: Theorizing Struggles against the Hegemony of Management Organization Studies, November 1, 2007; 28(11): 1667 - 1698. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Musson, L. Cohen, and S. Tietze Pedagogy and the 'Linguistic Turn': Developing Understanding Through Semiotics Management Learning, February 1, 2007; 38(1): 45 - 60. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Gustavs and S. Clegg Working the Knowledge Game?: Universities and Corporate Organizations in Partnership Management Learning, March 1, 2005; 36(1): 9 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Lange Regulatory Spaces and Interactions: An Introduction Social Legal Studies, December 1, 2003; 12(4): 411 - 423. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. M. Livesey Eco-Identity as Discursive Struggle: Royal Dutch/Shell, Brent Spar, and Nigeria Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 2001; 38(1): 58 - 91. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. A. Welcomer, D. A. Gioia, and M. Kilduff Resisting the Discourse of Modernity: Rationality Versus Emotion in Hazardous Waste Siting Human Relations, September 1, 2000; 53(9): 1175 - 1205. [Abstract] [PDF]