Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rhodes, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reading and Writing Organizational Lives

Carl Rhodes

University of Technology, Sydney, carl.rhodes{at}uts.edu.au

This paper examines the use of multiple reading strategies as a way to conduct research into organizational life. The paper reviews the role of paradigm thinking as being the dominant approach to understanding research methodology in organization studies. It is argued that paradigm diversity has taken a position of meta-theoretical hegemony where students of organizations are compelled to enter into the paradigm discourse in order to do research. Based on the work of Cleo Cherryholmes, it is further argued that a `reading' rather than `researching' based approach is a way of doing organizational enquiry outside the paradigm framework. An account of organizational life in an autobiographical format is presented and is `read' using three different reading strategies-one feminist, one critical and one deconstructive. The implications of these reading strategies for researching organizational life are then discussed.

Key Words: organizational story telling • paradigms of analysis • research literacies

Organization, Vol. 7, No. 1, 7-29 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/135050840071002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
OrganizationHome page
C. Rhodes and A. D. Brown
Writing Responsibly: Narrative Fiction and Organization Studies
Organization, July 1, 2005; 12(4): 467 - 491.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
M. Learmonth
The Violence in Trusting Trust Chief Executives: Glimpsing Trust in the U.K. National Health Service
Qualitative Inquiry, August 1, 2004; 10(4): 581 - 600.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
S. R. Clegg, M. Kornberger, and C. Rhodes
Noise, Parasites and Translation: Theory and Practice in Management Consulting
Management Learning, March 1, 2004; 35(1): 31 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
C. Rhodes
Ghostwriting Research: Positioning the Researcher in the Interview Text
Qualitative Inquiry, December 1, 2000; 6(4): 511 - 525.
[Abstract] [PDF]