|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Seeing Organizational Learning: A `Cultural' View
Dvora Yanow
California State University, Hayward, USA, dyanow{at}csuhayward.edu
What sight does a `cultural' approach to organizational learning enable? In an earlier essay my co-author and I argued that such an approach made it possible to bypass certain conceptual problems inherent in treating organizational learning as an attribute of individuals. In this essay I reflect on the metaphoric process that enabled that argument, which was implicitly as much methodological as it was ontological and epistemological, and spell out the attributes of such an approach, which today I would term `interpretive'. I touch briefly on questions of organizational size and geographic dispersal raised by another field-based study and conclude with a brief comparison of `culture' with `communities of practice', both of which enable a collective approach, and with some observations on the implications of a cultural-interpretive approach for research methods.
Key Words: culture interpretive analysis metaphor practice
Organization, Vol. 7, No. 2,
247-268 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/135050840072003

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Geiger
Revisiting the Concept of Practice: Toward an Argumentative Understanding of Practicing
Management Learning,
April 1, 2009;
40(2):
129 - 144.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Fenwick
Understanding Relations of Individual--Collective Learning in Work: A Review of Research
Management Learning,
July 1, 2008;
39(3):
227 - 243.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Belkhodja, N. Amara, R. Landry, and M. Ouimet
The Extent and Organizational Determinants of Research Utilization in Canadian Health Services Organizations
Science Communication,
March 1, 2007;
28(3):
377 - 417.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Schreyogg and D. Geiger
The Significance of Distinctiveness: A Proposal for Rethinking Organizational Knowledge
Organization,
January 1, 2007;
14(1):
77 - 100.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Feldman and S. P. Feldman
What Links the Chain: An Essay on Organizational Remembering as Practice
Organization,
November 1, 2006;
13(6):
861 - 887.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Ron, R. Lipshitz, and M. Popper
How Organizations Learn: Post-flight Reviews in an F-16 Fighter Squadron
Organization Studies,
August 1, 2006;
27(8):
1069 - 1089.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. C. Kellogg, W. J. Orlikowski, and J. Yates
Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations
Organization Science,
January 1, 2006;
17(1):
22 - 44.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Chiva and J. Alegre
Organizational Learning and Organizational Knowledge: Towards the Integration of Two Approaches
Management Learning,
March 1, 2005;
36(1):
49 - 68.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Thompson
Structural and Epistemic Parameters in Communities of Practice
Organization Science,
March 1, 2005;
16(2):
151 - 164.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Elkjaer
Organizational Learning: The 'Third Way'
Management Learning,
December 1, 2004;
35(4):
419 - 434.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Contu and H. Willmott
Comment on Wenger and Yanow. Knowing in Practice: A `Delicate Flower' in the Organizational Learning Field
Organization,
May 1, 2000;
7(2):
269 - 276.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|