Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benders, J.
Right arrow Articles by Van Veen, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

What's in a Fashion? Interpretative Viability and Management Fashions

Jos Benders

University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands, j.benders{at}bw.kun.nl

Kees Van Veen

University of Groningen, the Netherlands, k.van.veen{at}bdk.rug.nl

Building and reacting on the most influential article on the topic, namely, `Management Fashion' by Abrahamson (Academy of Management Review 21(1), 1996), we propose that management fashions are best conceptualized as `the production and consumption of temporarily intensive management discourse, and the organizational changes induced by and associated with this discourse'. This conceptualization allows us to take account of `interpretative viability', a certain degree of ambiguity about a fashion `s content, and its consequences for the dynamics involved in the ongoing shaping and reshaping of a concept's connotations. Our arguments are illustrated by drawing on a variety of empirical work on Business Process Reengineering in the Netherlands.

Key Words: interpretative viability • management fashion • organization concepts

Organization, Vol. 8, No. 1, 33-53 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/135050840181003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J. G. Cullen
How to sell your soul and still get into Heaven: Steven Covey's epiphany-inducing technology of effective selfhood
Human Relations, August 1, 2009; 62(8): 1231 - 1254.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
J. Moisander and S. Stenfors
Exploring the Edges of Theory-Practice Gap: Epistemic Cultures in Strategy-Tool Development and Use
Organization, March 1, 2009; 16(2): 227 - 247.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
K. Hoeyer
Informed Consent: The Making of a Ubiquitous Rule in Medical Practice
Organization, March 1, 2009; 16(2): 267 - 288.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
A. Whittle
From Flexibility to Work-Life Balance: Exploring the Changing Discourses of Management Consultants
Organization, July 1, 2008; 15(4): 513 - 534.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. Perkmann and A. Spicer
How are management fashions institutionalized? The role of institutional work
Human Relations, June 1, 2008; 61(6): 811 - 844.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
H. R. Ekbia and N. Hara
The quality of evidence in knowledge management research: practitioner versus scholarly literature
Journal of Information Science, February 1, 2008; 34(1): 110 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International SociologyHome page
L. Karsten, K. van Veen, and A. van Wulfften Palthe
What Happened to the Popularity of the Polder Model?: Emergence and Disappearance of a Political Fashion
International Sociology, January 1, 2008; 23(1): 35 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
J. J. Nijholt and J. Benders
Coevolution in Management Fashions: The Case of Self-Managing Teams in The Netherlands
Group Organization Management, December 1, 2007; 32(6): 628 - 652.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J. Swan, M. Bresnen, S. Newell, and M. Robertson
The object of knowledge: The role of objects in biomedical innovation
Human Relations, December 1, 2007; 60(12): 1809 - 1837.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
D. Seidl
General Strategy Concepts and the Ecology of Strategy Discourses: A Systemic-Discursive Perspective
Organization Studies, February 1, 2007; 28(2): 197 - 218.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
S. Heusinkveld and J. Benders
Contested commodification: Consultancies and their struggle with new concept development
Human Relations, March 1, 2005; 58(3): 283 - 310.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
R. Fincham and R. Roslender
Rethinking the Dissemination of Management Fashion: Accounting for Intellectual Capital in UK Case Firms
Management Learning, August 1, 2004; 35(3): 321 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
A. Sturdy
The Adoption of Management Ideas and Practices: Theoretical Perspectives and Possibilities
Management Learning, June 1, 2004; 35(2): 155 - 179.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
T. Clark and D. Greatbatch
Management Fashion as Image-Spectacle: The Production of Best-Selling Management Books
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 2004; 17(3): 396 - 424.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
R. Badham, K. Garrety, V. Morrigan, M. Zanko, and P. Dawson
Designer Deviance: Enterprise and Deviance in Culture Change Programmes
Organization, November 1, 2003; 10(4): 707 - 730.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Economic and Industrial DemocracyHome page
K. Hamde
Teamwork: Fashion or Institution?
Economic and Industrial Democracy, August 1, 2002; 23(3): 389 - 420.
[Abstract] [PDF]