Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trowler, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Captured by the Discourse? The Socially Constitutive Power of New Higher Education Discourse in the UK

Paul Trowler

University of Lancaster, UK, p.trowler{at}lancaster.ac.uk

This paper addresses the extent to which academic staff are ‘captured’ by the discourse associated with the ‘new higher education’ (NHE) in the UK and identifies the factors which condition their ability to displace, negotiate, reconstruct and create alternative discourses. In addressing this task, the paper draws on data from a five-year ethnographic study of an English university, NewU, a single document from NewU published after that study, a comparative study of ‘new’ academics in England and Canada, and spontaneous textual data produced at a conference on higher education. The paper concludes that the dialogical nature of universities means that the impact of NHE discourse on organizational practices is mitigated as it is read and reacted to in varied ways: that academics are not fundamentally ‘captured’ by this discursive form. However, caution is advised in extending this argument too far.

Key Words: agency • discourse • new higher education • policy • structure • text

Organization, Vol. 8, No. 2, 183-201 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1350508401082005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Organization StudiesHome page
G. Symon, A. Buehring, P. Johnson, and C. Cassell
Positioning Qualitative Research as Resistance to the Institutionalization of the Academic Labour Process
Organization Studies, October 1, 2008; 29(10): 1315 - 1336.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
A. Whittle, F. Mueller, and A. Mangan
In Search of Subtlety: Discursive Devices and Rhetorical Competence
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 2008; 22(1): 99 - 122.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
S. Hotho and D. Pollard
Management as Negotiation at the Interface: Moving Beyond the Critical--Practice Impasse
Organization, July 1, 2007; 14(4): 583 - 603.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
W. Larner and R. Le Heron
Neo-liberalizing Spaces and Subjectivities: Reinventing New Zealand Universities
Organization, November 1, 2005; 12(6): 843 - 862.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
A. Whittle
Preaching and practising 'flexibility': Implications for theories of subjectivity at work
Human Relations, October 1, 2005; 58(10): 1301 - 1322.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Time SocietyHome page
T. Keenoy
Facing Inwards and Outwards at Once: The liminal temporalities of academic perfomativity
Time Society, September 1, 2005; 14(2-3): 303 - 321.
[Abstract] [PDF]