Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linstead, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Organization as Reply: Henri Bergson and Casual Organization Theory

Stephen Linstead

University of Essex, UK, linstead{at}essex.ac.uk

This paper introduces a symposium of three other papers on the work of Henri Bergson, which develop his idea of creative evolution and argue for the continuing relevance and vitality of Bergson's work for contemporary organization studies. Bergson's corpus is reviewed, along with some suggestions as to his relevance for contemporary organization theory. It is argued that Bergson's work would view organization as part of its object, a process that is changed by that engagement in non-dialectical conversation with it. Organizing, then, is a reply to the object, an act that creates its own possibility. Calculative and formalistic organization theory fails to take into account the importance of intuition as a form of knowing, responsive to the shifting nature of both its object and itself over time, which a casual organization theory, on Bergsonian lines, would do. However, there is no Bergsonian system or programme to be offered here-merely an introduction to some of the rich veins of ideas in his work, and an invitation to engage with them-an invitation, which, like all invitations, invites reply.

Key Words: casual organization theory • creative evolution • duration • intuition • philosophy of process

Organization, Vol. 9, No. 1, 95-111 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1350508402009001350


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
OrganizationHome page
D. P. O'Doherty
The Question of Theoretical Excess: Folly and Fall in theorizing Organization
Organization, November 1, 2007; 14(6): 837 - 867.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
S. Linstead and T. Thanem
Multiplicity, Virtuality and Organization: The Contribution of Gilles Deleuze
Organization Studies, October 1, 2007; 28(10): 1483 - 1501.
[Abstract] [PDF]