Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organization
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neyland, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Achieving Transparency: The Visible, Invisible and Divisible in Academic Accountability Networks

Daniel Neyland

Said Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, daniel.neyland{at}sbs.ox.ac.uk

Demands for greater transparency form an increasingly prevalent feature of many areas of organizational activity. Through the rubric of transparency, demands are made for organizations to demonstrate recognition of their responsibility for environmental impact, how money is spent, the returns received on money invested and so on. This paper argues that transparency reviews, however, do not straightforwardly open up opportunities for observing the internal dynamics of an organization in order to render the organization accountable and its members aware of their responsibilities. Instead, transparency reviews encourage the adoption of new or re-formatted informational production processes that produce information intended to fit the auspices of the review. In this way, internal aspects of organizations are not `made available' but instead are re-oriented toward the production of specific forms of informational output that will externalize (or make available) a particular version of the internal dynamics of the organization. By studying these production processes in detail we find a series of ad-hoc, uncertain and disconnected processes through which accountability criteria are met and transparency achieved.

Key Words: accountability • audit • democracy • responsibility • transparency • universities

References

  • Ackoff, R. (1981) Creating the Corporate Future—Plan or Be Planned For. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Baudrillard, J. (1993) The Transparency of Evil—Essays on Extreme Phenomena. London: Verso.
  • Brown, N. and Michael, M. (2002) `From Authority to Authenticity: The Changing Governance of Biotechnology', Health, Risk and Society 4(3): 259—72.[CrossRef]
  • Canning, M. and O'Dwyer, B. (2001) `Professional Accounting Bodies' Disciplinary Procedures: Accountable, Transparent and in the Public Interest?', European Accounting Review 10(4): 725—50.[CrossRef]
  • de Laet, M. and Mol, A. (2000) `The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology', Social Studies of Science 30(2): 225—63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Drew, C. (2004) `Transparency of Environmental Decision Making: A Case of Soil Cleanup Inside the Hanford 100 Area', Journal of Risk Research 7(1): 33—71.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Douglas, M. (1984) Purity and Danger. London: Routledge.
  • Fjelstad, O. and Haanaes, K. (2001) `Strategy Tradeoffs in the Knowledge and Network Economy', Business Strategy Review 12(1): 1—10.
  • Garfinkel, H. (1972) `Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities', in D. Sudnow (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction, pp. 1—31. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Gordon, M. (1969) Transparent Web—A Book of Poems. London: Arcadian Press.
  • Gray, R. (2002) `The Social Accounting Project and Accountability Organizations and Society Privileging Engagement, Imaginings, New Accountings and Pragmatism Over Critique?', Accounting, Organizations and Society 27(7): 687—707.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Gray, R. (1992) `Accounting and Environmentalism: An Exploration of the Challenge of Gently Accounting for Accountability, Transparency and Sustainability', Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(5): 399—425.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Hefce (2000a) `The Concept of VfM', available from: www.hefce.ac.uk
  • Hefce (2000b) `An Exemplar VfM Strategy,' including `Implementing a VfM Strategy,' available from: www.hefce.ac.uk
  • Hetherington, K. (2002) `Second Handedness: Consumption, Disposal and Absent Presence', available from: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/soc097kh.html
  • Humphrey, C., Moizer, P. and Owen, D. (1995) `Questioning the Value of the Research Selectivity Process in British University Accounting', Accounting, Auditing and Accountability 8(3): 141—65.[CrossRef]
  • Latour, B. (1990) `Drawing Things Together', in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
  • Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Law, J. and Mol, A. ( 1998) `On Metrics and Fluids—Notes on Otherness', in R. Chia (ed.) Organised Worlds—Explorations in Technology and Organisations with Robert Cooper, pp. 20—38. London: Routledge.
  • Law, J. ( 1996) `Organising Accountabilities: Ontology and the Mode of Accounting', in R. Munro and J. Mouritsen (eds) Accountability: Power, Ethos and the Technologies of Managing, pp. 283—306. London: International Thomson Business Press.
  • Law, J., ed. (1986) Power, Action and Belief—A New Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Lee, A. ( 1999) `Researching MIS', in W. Currie and B. Galliers (eds) Rethinking Management Information Systems—An Interdisciplinary Perspective, pp. 7—27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Media Transparency (2003), see: http://www.mediatransparency.org/
  • Mol, A. and Law, J. ( 1994) `Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology', Social Studies Of Science 24: 641—71.[Abstract]
  • Morton, M. (1988) `Strategy Formulation Methodologies and IT', in M. Earl (ed.) Information Management—The Strategic Dimension, pp. 54—67. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Neyland, D. and Surridge, C. (2003) `Information Strategy Stories—Evolving a Dynamic Strategy Process', AUA Perspectives 7(1): 9—14.
  • Neyland, D. and Woolgar, S. (2002) `Accountability in Action? The Case of a Database Purchase Decision', British Journal of Sociology 53(2): 259—74.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Orna, E. (1999) Practical Information Policies, 2nd edn. Aldershot: Gower.
  • Pettigrew, A. (1987) `Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm', Journal Of Management Studies 24(6): 649—70.[CrossRef]
  • Power, M. (1994) The Audit Explosion. London: DEMOS.
  • Power, M. (1995) Audit and the Decline of Inspection. London: November, CIPFA, Public Finance Foundation.
  • Power, M. (1997a) The Audit Society Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Power, M. (1997b) `Expertise and the Construction of Relevance: Accountants and Environmental Audit', Accounting, Organizations and Society 22(2): 123—46.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Power, M. (1999) `Research Assessment Exercise: A Fatal Remedy? Knowledge for What? The Intellectual Consequences of the Research Assessment Exercise', History of the Human Sciences 12(4): 135—37.[Free Full Text]
  • Puxty, A., Sikka, P. and Willmott, H. (1994) `Systems of Surveillance and the Silencing of UK Academic Accounting Labour', British Accounting Review 26: 137—71.[CrossRef]
  • Rawls, J. (1993) Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Reponen, T. (1993) `Strategic Information Systems—A Conceptual Analysis', Journal Of Strategic Information Systems 2(2): 100—4.[CrossRef]
  • Rose, N. (1996) `Governing `Advanced' Liberal Democracies', in A. Barry, T. Osborne and N. Rose (eds) Foucault and Political Reason, pp. 37—64. London: UCL Press.
  • Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shaw, M. and Plepinger, E. (2001) `Ethical Guidelines: ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Provider Organisations Should Increase Transparency, Disclosure', Dispute Resolution Magazine, Spring Edition, see: http://www.adrassoc.com/Publications%5CShawPaplinger.pdf
  • Sikka, P. (2001) `Transparency and Accountability of the Professional Accountancy Bodies: Some Observations on the Canning and O'Dwyer Paper', European Accounting Review 10(4): 751—62.[CrossRef]
  • Smits, M., van der Poel, K. and Ribbers, P. (1997) `Assessment of Information Strategies in Insurance Companies in the Netherlands', Journal Of Strategic Information Systems 6: 129—48.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Star, S. and Griesemer, J. (1989) `Institutional Ecology, "Translations" and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907—39', Social Studies of Science 19: 387—420.[Abstract]
  • Strathern, M. (2002) `Abstraction and Decontextualisation: An Anthropological Comment', in S. Woolgar (ed.) Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality, pp. 302—13. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Strathern, M. (2004) Commons and Borderlands: Working Papers on Interdisciplinarity, Accountability and the Flow of Knowledge. Oxfordshire: Sean Kingston Publishing.
  • Strathern, M. (1999) `The Aesthetics of Substance', in M. Strathern (ed.) Property, Substance and Effect, pp 45—64. London: Athlone.
  • Tagiuri, R., Kogan, N. and Bruner, J. (1955) `The Transparency of Interpersonal Choice', American Sociological Association 18(4): 368—79.
  • Transparency International (2003), see: http://www.transparency.org/
  • Vattimo, G. (1992) The Transparent Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Wall, S. (1996) `Public Justification and the Transparency Argument', The Philosophical Quarterly 46(184): 501—7.[CrossRef]
  • Westphal, J. (1986) `White', Mind 95: 311—28.[Web of Science]
  • Willmott, H. (1995) `Managing the Academics: Commodification and Control in the Development of University Education in the UK', Human Relations 48(9): 993—1027.[Abstract]
  • Woolgar, S. (1991) `Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trails', in J. Law (ed.) A Sociology Of Monsters. London: Routledge.
  • Zadek, S. and Raymond, P. (1995) `Social Auditing, Transparency and Accountability ', Accounting Forum 19(2—3).

Organization, Vol. 14, No. 4, 499-516 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1350508407078050


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neyland, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?