|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Liberalist Fantasies:  i ek and the Impossibility of the Open Society
Christian De Cock
School of Business and Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK, c.de-cock{at}swansea.ac.uk
Steffen Böhm
Department of Accounting, Finance and Management, University of Essex, Colchester, UK, sgbohm{at}essex.ac.uk
In this paper we engage with the liberalist project in organization and management studies. The first `face' of organizational liberalism is expressed through post-bureaucratic discourses which very much define the mainstream of management thought today, highlighting the need for organizational openness which can only come through a liberation of management from the closed structures of the bureaucracy. The second face of organizational liberalism defends the bureaucratic ethos of liberal-democratic institutions and points to the Popperian concept of the `open society' that requires rational, procedural laws to reconcile conflicting values in societies and organizations, thus ensuring the existence of a plurality of ways of life. We point to the limitations of both `faces' of organizational liberalism by discussing key aspects of Slavoj  i ek's work. iek displaces the liberal conception of institutionally sanctioned `openness' by claiming this actually constitutes a closure and puts a challenge to us. How can we create real openness? How is a real difference possible?
Key Words: bureaucracy • capitalism • ideology • liberalism • open society • political philosophy • iek
References
- Adler, P.S. and Borys, B. (1996) `Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive ', Administrative Science Quarterly 41(1): 61—89.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Ansell Pearson, K. (2004) `Demanding Deleuze', Radical Philosophy 126: 33—38.
- Armbrüster, T. (2003) `Political Liberalism, Management, and Organization Theory', paper presented at the 19th EGOS Colloquium, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark, July.
- Armbrüster, T. and Gebert, D. (2002) `Uncharted Territories of Organizational Research: The Case of Karl Popper's Open Society and Its Enemies', Organization Studies 23(2): 169—88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Berlin, I. (2002) Liberty, H. Hardy (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Boje, D.M. and Rosile, G.A. (n.d.) `In the Belly of the Beast with Tom Peters: A Deconstruction of Guru and Evangelist Tom Peters', available at http://web.nmsu.edu/~dboje/TDpetersobtc.html
- Boyett, J.H. and Boyett, J.T. (2001) The Guru Guide to the Knowledge Economy: The Best Ideas for Operating Profitably in a Hyper-Competitive World. Chichester: John Wiley.
- Butler, J. (2006) `Israel/Palestine and the Paradoxes of Academic Freedom', Radical Philosophy 135: 8—17.
- Butler, J., E. Laclau and iek, S. (2000) Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. London: Verso.
- Calvino, I. (1987) The Literature Machine. London: Vintage.
- Chomsky, N. (1998) Profits Over People: Neoliberalism and the Global Order. New York, NY: Seven Stories Press.
- Courpasson, D. (2000) `Managerial Strategies of Domination. Power in Soft Bureaucracies', Organization Studies 21(1): 141—62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Courpasson, D. and Reed, M. (2004) `Introduction: Bureaucracy in the Age of Enterprise ', Organization 11(1): 5—12.[Free Full Text]
- Drury, S.B. (1999) Leo Strauss and the American Right. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- du Gay ( 1994a) `Making Up Managers: Bureaucracy, Enterprise and the Liberal Art of Separation', British Journal of Sociology 45: 655—74.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- du Gay, P. (1994b) `Colossal Immodesties and Hopeful Monsters', Organization 1(1): 125—48.[Abstract]
- du Gay, P. (2000a) In Praise of Bureaucracy: Weber, Organization, Ethics. London: Sage.
- du Gay, P. (2000b) `Enterprise and its Futures: A Response to Fournier and Grey', Organization 7(1): 165—83.[Free Full Text]
- du Gay, P. (2003) `The Tyranny of the Epochal: Change, Epochalism and Organizational Reform', Organization 10(4): 663—84.[Abstract]
- du Gay, P. (2004) `Against "Enterprise" (But Not Against "Enterprise", For That Would Make No Sense)', Organization 11(1): 37—57.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Eagleton, T. (2001) `Enjoy!', Paragraph 24(2): 40—52.
- Fleming, P. (2004) `Progress, Pessimism, Critique', Ephemera: Critical Dialogues on Organization 4(1): 40—49.
- Frank, T. 92001) One Market Under God; Extreme Capitalism, Market Populism and the End of Economic Democracy. London: Secker and Warburg.
- Gebert, D. and Boerner, S. (1999) `The Open and Closed Corporation as Conflicting Forms of Organization', The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 35(3): 341—59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gilbert, J. (2001) `Contingency, Hegemony, Universality', New Formations 48.
- Giroux, H.A. (2004) The Terror of Neoliberalism: Cultural Politics and the Promise of Democracy. New York, NY: Paradigm.
- Gray, J. (2000) Two Faces of Liberalism. New York, NY: The New Press.
- Grey, C. and Garsten, C. (2002) `Organized and Disorganized Utopias: An Essay on Presumption', in M. Parker (ed.) Utopia and Organization, pp. 9—23. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Harpham, G.G. (2003) `Doing the Impossible: Slavoj iek and the End of Knowledge', Critical Inquiry 29(3): 453—85.[CrossRef]
- Harvey, D. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Heckscher, C. and Donnellon, A. (1994) The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change. London: Sage.
- Hertz, N. (2001) The Silent Takeover: Global Capitalism and the Death of Democracy. London: Arrow.
- Hobbes, T. (1998) Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Holmes, S. (1995) Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Jameson, F. (2005) Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions. London: Verso.
- Kant, I. (1998) Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kay, S. ( 2003) iek: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.
- Klein, N. (2001) No Logo. London: Flamingo.
- Knights, D. and Willmott, H., eds (2000) The Reengineering Revolution: Critical Studies of Corporate Change. London: Sage.
- Lacan, J. (1977) Ecrits: A Selection, trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock.
- Lacan, J. (1998) The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, trans. Alan Sheridan, Jacques-Alain Miller (ed.). London: Vintage.
- Laclau, E. (2005) On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
- Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
- Leys, C. (2003) Market Driven Politics: Neoliberal Democracy and the Public Interest. London: Verso.
- Lobe, J. (2003) `Leo Strauss' Philosophy of Deception', AlterNet, posted 19 May, http://www.alternet.org/story/15935
- Massumi, B. (2002) `Introduction: Like a Thought', in B. Massumi (ed.) A Shock to Thought: Expression after Deleuze and Guattari, pp. xiii—xxxix. London: Routledge.
- Monbiot, G. (2001) Captive State: The Corporate Takeover of Britain. London: Pan Books.
- Mouffe, C. (2005) `Some Reflections on an Agonistic Approach to the Public', In B. Latour and P. Weibel (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy: pp. 804—7. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
- Mill, J.S. (1982) On Liberty. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
- Nicol, B. (2001) `As If: Traversing the Fantasy in iek ', Paragraph 24(2): 140—56.[Web of Science]
- O'Doherty, D. (2004) `Management? ... Whatever', Ephemera: Critical Dialogues on Organization 4(1): 76—93.
- Parker, M. (2002) `Utopia and the Organizational Imagination: Eutopia ', in M. Parker (ed.) Utopia and Organization, pp.217—24. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Peters, T.J. (1987) Thriving on Chaos: Handbook for a Management Revolution. New York, NY: Knopf.
- Peters, T.J. (1992) Liberation Management. London: Macmillan.
- Peters, T.J. and Austin, N. (1985) A Passion for Excellence: The Leadership Difference. New York, NY: Random House.
- Peters, T.J. and Watermans, R.H. (1982) In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
- Popper, K.R. (1945) The Open Society and Its Enemies, Vols I and II. London: Routledge.
- Rawls, J. (1996) Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
- Reed, M. (1999) `From the Cage to the Gaze? The Dynamics of Organizational Control in Late Modernity', in G. Morgan and L. Engwall (eds) Regulation and Organizations: International Perspectives, pp. 27—49. London: Routledge.
- Robinson, A. and Tormey, S. (2004) `iek is Not a Radical', Thesis Eleven 78.
- Soros, G. (2000) Open Society: Reforming Global Capitalism. London: Little, Brown and Company.
- Soros, G. (2004) The Bubble of American Supremacy. London: Orion.
- Strauss, L. (1959) What is Political Philosophy? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Strauss, L. (1989) An Introduction to Political Philosophy: Ten Essays by Leo Strauss. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
- Weick, K.E. and Sutcliffe, K.M. (2001) Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
- Willmott, H. (1993) `Strength is Ignorance; Slavery is Freedom: Managing Culture in Modern Organizations', Journal of Management Studies 30(4): 515—52.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Warwick Organizational Behaviour Staff (WOBS) ( 2001) Organizational Studies: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management (4 volumes). London: Routledge.
- iek, S. (2001) On Belief. Routledge: London.
- iek, S. (2002a) Revolution at the Gates: Selected Writings of Lenin from 1917. London: Verso.
- iek, S. (2002b) Welcome to the Desert of the Real. London: Verso.
- iek, S. (2002c) `Civil Society, Fanaticism, and Digital Reality ', in G. Lovink (ed.) Uncanny Networks: Dialogues with the Virtual Intelligentsia. Cambridge, MA: MIT
- iek, S. (2003) The Puppet and the Dwarf: The Perverse Core of Christianity. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
- iek, S. (2004a). Organs Without Bodies: On Deleuze and Consequences. London: Routledge.
- iek, S. (2004b). Iraq: The Borrowed Kettle. London: Verso.
- iek, S. and Daly, G. (2004) Conversations with iek. Cambridge: Polity.
Organization, Vol. 14, No. 6,
815-836 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1350508407082264
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
A. Spicer, M. Alvesson, and D. Karreman
Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies
Human Relations,
April 1, 2009;
62(4):
537 - 560.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Woolgar, C. Coopmans, and D. Neyland
Does STS Mean Business?
Organization,
January 1, 2009;
16(1):
5 - 30.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Bohm and V. Brei
Marketing the hegemony of development: of pulp fictions and green deserts
Marketing Theory,
December 1, 2008;
8(4):
339 - 366.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Styhre
Management Control in Bureaucratic and Postbureaucratic Organizations: A Lacanian Perspective
Group Organization Management,
December 1, 2008;
33(6):
635 - 656.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Contu
Decaf Resistance: On Misbehavior, Cynicism, and Desire in Liberal Workplaces
Management Communication Quarterly,
February 1, 2008;
21(3):
364 - 379.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
